ShadiDandashi

Independent researcher in neural computation.

CLICK TO START
WHAT DRIVES MY WORK

Curiosity and personal experience have been a stepping stone for me in many pursuits, two of which today are medicine and research in neural computation. I have been a person who is driven by the seeking of knowledge in system understanding and that lead me to studying how complex systems work such as the human body and use that understanding to help people. Across both pursuits, my aim is to turn what I learn into something useful for humanity whether through scientific research, technology development, or the practice of medicine.

UNDERSTANDING SYSTEMS

My interest in systems first developed through practical exploration of mechanical and electronic systems from things that was sitting in my house. Those experiences of taking things apart and trying to understand from first principles why and how things work helped me understand system level relations that determine the behavior of that whole system. This perspective framework has become the foundation for how I approach other subjects, including biology.

FROM SYSTEMS TO MEDICAL STUDIES

My desire to help people led me toward medicine, while my interest in systems shaped how I approached the science behind it. At Florida Atlantic University, I studied Medical Biology and completed my degree in preparation for a medical career, and in that process I was exposed to anatomy, physiology, biomechanics, cell biology, physics, chemistry, etc... and that expanded the perspective I originally developed through engineering. Studying the human body changed how I understood the relationship between structure, interaction, and function, and how I thought about designing technology.

THE QUESTION THAT EMERGED DURING COLLEGE

During those undergraduate studies, I developed a machine-learning model for disease classification. That project brought computation into the biological questions I was studying. Building it also drew my attention to how learning worked in that particular system of how training changed the model, but those changes did not continue in the same way when the model was running. I began asking whether a computational system could learn through its ongoing operation and retain those changes for later use.

TURNING THAT QUESTION INTO RESEARCH

I began researching & developing a model architecture originally using the conventional systems and equations of today's AI models but I kept realizing something within the fundamental equations of the AI models today, they don't actually allow for continuous learning if used as is with small manipulations. So that brought up another question, what would classify as being an equation and learning algorithm that can learn continuously, how would it work if we don't take anything from todays models and most importantly will it actually be able to learn and retain information on the fly.

THE BEGINNING OF LCNA

That is what made me realize I needed to start from the ground up, from scratch, and research & develop a new way of AI neural computation. That's when LCNA was born.

In many neural networks, learning happens before the model is put to use. Train. Optimize. Deploy.

Continual-learning research asks how systems can acquire new information without losing what they have learned. My work begins with the same question, informed by my study of biological systems.

What if learning remained part of the computation?

Learning during computation

LCNA investigates whether learning can continue during a system's operation. The central question is whether experience can produce lasting changes that influence later responses.

THE RESEARCH

An original computational foundation

I formulated LCNA's mathematical foundation and developed its initial prototype independently. My background in medical biology informs this work, particularly my interest in the relationship between learning, memory, and computation.

Controlled experimental research

The first experiments focused on a reduced, supervised prototype. I examined whether the effects of a learning experience persisted and whether they mattered to later responses.

RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS

Research findings and direction

The initial work produced limited retention findings and a basis for further investigation.

01 — RETENTION

Changes following a controlled learning experience remained observable in later tests within the experimental setting.

02 — CONTROLLED COMPARISONS

Controlled comparisons supported a relationship between the retained effects and later responses.

03 — CONSISTENCY ACROSS RUNS

The retention pattern appeared in three development runs. These were internal research results, not independent replications.

04 — SCIENTIFIC FOUNDATION

I am now examining the neuroscience of learning and memory to guide LCNA's further development.

EVIDENCE SCOPE

Current evidence and limitations

EXPERIMENTAL STATUS

The reduced learning experiment did not meet its full validation criteria. Its retention findings are limited to the tested conditions.

NOT YET ESTABLISHED

The current evidence does not establish continual learning, general reasoning, biological fidelity, or a performance advantage.

DEVELOPMENT TIMELINE

Research progression

I began by developing the mathematical foundation and an initial prototype, then examined its learning behavior. The current focus is neuroscience research.

KEEP SCROLLING →
01PAST MILESTONE

Computational Foundation

Developed an independent mathematical foundation and an initial prototype to investigate learning and neural computation.

02PAST MILESTONE

Retention Findings

Observed response changes that persisted after a supervised learning experience.

03PAST MILESTONE

Experimental Assessment

Extended the experimental work to assess the findings and their limits.

04CURRENT FOCUS

Foundational Research

Examine neuroscience evidence relevant to learning, memory, and computation to guide further development.

05PLANNED RESEARCH

Scientific Validation

Define the criteria and experiments needed to assess the reliability of future results.

06FUTURE DIRECTION

Memory and Learning

Investigate the conditions needed for more reliable retention and learning across successive experiences.

07FUTURE DIRECTION

Broader Evaluation

Assess whether future findings hold across a wider range of experimental conditions.

08FUTURE DIRECTION

Performance Research

Evaluate future computing approaches for practical execution and resource requirements.

NEXT

Advancing neural computation

I am seeking research support and grant funding to advance LCNA's scientific foundations and experimental validation.

I welcome discussions about the work and ways to support it.

READ THE RESEARCH EVIDENCE → DISCUSS RESEARCH SUPPORT →

Discuss research support

Contact me about research discussions, grant opportunities, or support for LCNA.

Your message and contact details will be processed by FormSubmit and delivered to my email. Please do not include confidential research, medical information, or other sensitive details.